top of page
Search

In support of the wider campaign led by TTCRiders, Brad wrote a letter to Mayor Olivia Chow, TTC Chair Jamaal Myers, and Toronto City Councillors. Everyone across Ontario needs to pay attention to what is happening with the TTC’s “Family of Services” (FOS) model as it is being proposed all across the GTHA and wider Province.

If we can stop it here, we can stop it everywhere.


For more on the Family of Services model, see TTCRiders WheelTrans Cuts petition: https://www.ttcriders.ca/wheeltranscuts

 

Subject: Wheel-Trans and the Family of Services (FOS) Model at the TTC


2 December 2024

Dear Mayor Chow, TTC Chair Myers, and Toronto City Councillors


As the Executive Director of Disability Justice Network of Ontario and a resident of Ward 12, I write to you regarding our deep and lasting concerns regarding the TTC’s “Family of Services” (FOS) model. In opposition to this model, we would strongly encourage you to both invest in protecting door-to-door Wheel-Trans access and joining the wider movement around this Province to ensure accessible, affordable transit for all.


We know that the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act has failed to be implemented and materialized across this Province, practically. In the spirit of existing legislation, cities are encouraged to expand access, not to limit it. However, the Wheel-Trans 10-Year Strategy has consistently failed to uphold these values and the consequences are wide-ranging. While GTHA interconnectedness and regional transit accessibility becomes more complex and less straightforward for disabled riders, the TTC is serving as a model for how many transit agencies wish to move forward, which sadly, is in the wrong direction.


Through this plan and the FOS model, TTC plans to screen out 50% of current Wheel-Trans users from door-to-door services to meet “diversion targets” and leave disabled riders with an inconsistent, unsafe, inaccessible conventional system. As is obvious to any disabled rider, the TTC is not fully accessible and will not be up to AODA standards by 2025. This has been the reality I’ve experienced as a disabled rider, where injury, strain, failed accessibility features are a regular occurance.


Wheel-Trans users need choice and safety and the FOS model does not meet this standard and should not be made mandatory for any disabled Wheel-Trans riders. 


It is also clear that this model reflects an effort, long before the current Mayoral administration, to cut costs. Forcing seniors and disabled people to use the conventional TTC just to save public money that should be invested in accessibility is a failure of public, social policy and deeply counter to the values of Torontonians. Such actions will result in riders:

  • getting stranded at bus stops: Instead of a single, door-to-door trip, the “Family of Services” involves multiple transfers. Conventional TTC might be accessible on paper, but in reality, TTC buses can be too crowded to board. FOS trips can also involve Wheel-Trans pick-ups at TTC stops halfway through a trip: People get stranded when their connecting TTC bus trip is more than 5 minutes late, the grace period that a Wheel-Trans vehicle will wait.

  • feeling isolated: Being forced to use conventional streetcars, subways, and buses will discourage people from using transit, resulting in isolation and a loss of independence.

  • taking more expensive transit trips: Because “Family of Services” trips involve multiple transfers between Wheel-Trans vehicles, buses, streetcars, and subways,, Wheel-Trans users have reported that some trips take longer than the 2-hour transfer window, and can cost two fares.

  • having unsafe transit trips: People with chronic health conditions and disabilities are concerned about the risk of being pushed or jostled on crowded subway platforms and slipping or falling while boarding crowded buses.


What’s further, as your own consultations have indicated, Wheel-Trans users do not support this policy. Public consultations held in April 2024 found that:

  • 39% of Wheel-Trans users said they would never use the Family of Services.

  • 61% of Wheel-Trans users felt that the TTC did not meet their accessibility requirements.

  • 60% of Wheel-Trans users feel that crowding is an issue that affects people with disabilities.


Further to this: many “Conditional” Wheel-Trans users have the condition that they are eligible for Wheel-Trans door-to-door trips only in the peak periods. But because the 2023 TTC Operating Budget changed the crowding standard from the TTC’s official Service Standards, every hour has become rush hour. Service in the off-peak is currently planned for "standing room only,” and people who use wheelchairs and other assistive devices have reported that conventional buses are sometimes too crowded to get on. I have seen this in my own lived experience of attempting to use the TTC every week in this city.


Finally, as with so many of our social services, financial and other barriers are preventing Wheel-Trans users from engaging with appeals processes around their “Conditional” status: From gathering supporting documentation for the appeal requires booking appointments with specialists to paying for a doctor's notes and attendant supports—administrative appeals of these processes take time and money in an already incredibly costly city for disabled people. This is only more so for racialized, disabled riders who face the intersections of medical racism when navigating gathering information for these appeals processes.


The estimated cost of maintaining door-to-door service for all Wheel-Trans users in 2025 is $5.3 million. This is nothing compared to countless other expenses that are made by the City on policing, on mega-events, and much more. It is time for extended investment into accessibility on the TTC in all areas. It’s time to surpass the city’s failure to advance the AODA. It’s time to join disabled organizers to advocate for more from the Province. 


As such, we join TTCRiders and others in the city to urge you to fully fund the cost of maintaining this critical service and to vote against making the “Family of Services” mandatory.


Respectfully, 


Brad Evoy,

Executive Director, Disability Justice Network of Ontario

After being abandoned through the pandemic, disabled people living in long-term care facilities and group homes are once again invisible to the Liberals in Ottawa’s new draft regulations.


BY KENDAL DAVID and MEGAN LINTON | September 27, 2024


The new Canada Disability Benefit is slated to roll out in July 2025. Once promising to lift hundreds of thousands of disabled Canadians out of poverty, the draft regulations reveal a limited program which advocates argue excludes many of the most marginalized and impoverished disabled people. 


After being abandoned through the COVID-19 pandemic, disabled people living in residential institutions like long-term care facilities, group homes, and continuing care facilities are once again invisible in the newly written draft regulations for the Canada Disability Benefit (CDB).


In particular, the draft regulations, released in June, make no reference to the more than 100,000 disabled Canadians living in residential institutions across the country. These facilities often subject disabled residents to abject living conditions: mass-produced meals lacking in nutrition, rationing of care, frequent infectious outbreaks, and disproportionate rates of death. On top of these grave indignities, many institutionalized disabled people are forced to survive on just $5 a day.


Residential institutions continue to provide a core supply of housing for people with disabilities across Canada. In Ontario alone, about 63,000 disabled people who receive provincial social assistance payments from the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) live in institutions, according to data up to March 2019. The 14,800 people living in long-term care or group homes receive measly personal needs allowances of $149 per month from ODSP. The remaining 48,000 living in boarding homes get support from ODSP to pay their housing provider for room and board—often paid directly to landlords—and a $71 allowance to cover all other expenses.


Given the depth of poverty for institutionalized disabled people, they stand to gain a lot from receiving the otherwise inconsequential $200 a month benefit. An extra $200 can make a meaningful impact to blunt the sharp edge of isolation and the daily mundanity of institutional life by facilitating access to the internet, a personal phone line, taxi fare or bus passes, fresh fruits and vegetables, a gym membership, or a meal out with friends.


Institutionalized folks are among the poorest disabled people in Canada, and could be significantly better off with the new Benefit—if only they can access it. Currently, the regulations propose using the Disability Tax Credit (DTC) as the eligibility criteria to access the new benefit. The DTC application process is complex and burdensome, and—amongst other problems—presumes people have access to a family doctor, which over 2.5 million people in Ontario do not. The federal government has committed to fund a navigation support program to help disabled people file their taxes, and get their DTC application packages together. But it’s unclear whether the federal government either knows or cares that institutionalized people exist, and should be prioritized as a target population for these efforts. They’re not mentioned anywhere in the proposed CDB regulations, even as a target population for tax filing support.


The proposed regulations rationalize that using the DTC eligibility criteria allows the federal government to implement the CDB quickly. While the roll-out of the CDB is indeed urgent, it needs to be functional enough that the most impoverished people can access it in the first place. People living on allowances of $5 a day stand to benefit from the CDB, but they’re also among some of the least likely to bother filing taxes and jumping through the hoops of DTC’s complex—and potentially expensive—application.


It’s unsurprising that the CDB regulations ignore institutionalized disabled people given that the federal government hasn’t bothered to collect data about them since 1991. Unlike their neighbours in market or subsidized housing, disabled people in these institutional settings are excluded from the Canadian Survey on Disability. As the primary federal data source on disability, the federal government is using it to inform the design of regulations, their cost-benefit analysis, and impact modelling.


This lack of data presents an enormous challenge in the CDB's design, and will continue to be a thorn in the side of the federal government for years to come as it tries to evaluate its impact, and prove the CDB’s value to voters. But it’s not too late for the feds to take action, and to address these gaps.


If designed properly, the CDB could make meaningful impacts in the lives of the most marginalized Canadians. For it to work, and to ensure that institutionalized Canadians would receive the new CDB, the benefit eligibility criteria must include provincial social assistance recipients and those who get Canada Pension Plan-Disability. And for the benefit to actually count, the federal government needs to modernize and re-implement the institutional component of the Canadian Survey on Disability so the true impacts for all disabled people can be really understood.


Kendal David is a PhD candidate in social work at Carleton University. She’s currently studying institutionalized poverty in Ontario using policy and discourse analysis, and interviews with institutionalized folks in Ottawa. 


Megan Linton is the policy lead at the Disability Justice Network of Ontario, creator of the audio documentary project Invisible Institutions, and a PhD Candidate at Carleton University.


Thursday, 18 July 2024


For Immediate Release—Hamilton, Treaty Three Territory: Despite a growing preference for community-based alternatives to nursing homes, Ontario’s home care options remain difficult to access and even violent. Those who run the home care sector and all levels of government, together, do not provide enough support for people who need assistance living at home nor for the many immigrant workers who provide home care services. Rather than working together for change, home care workers and receivers are often exploited and pitted against each other. 


The Towards Just Care research project, partnered with the Disability Justice Network of Ontario, calls for a sector-wide transformation toward more socially just home care guided by home care receivers, workers, and grassroots advocates. 


Their recent digital toolkit—Just Care Dreams—includes resources ranging from system navigation tools, advocacy tips, and maps outlining Ontario’s home care oligopolies and their networks. It draws on resource mapping, insights, workshops, and stories from a network of diverse home care stakeholders including low-income home care receivers, home care workers, and grassroots organizations representing seniors, disabled people, and migrant workers.


“When we talked to the communities around us, we knew it was time to come together, bring forward our common goals, and dream for better home care systems across these territories. We found examples and started to develop models of socially just care through this project. While this is only the first step, we want to share those insights and resources, so we can build more together”, explains Megan Linton, PhD Candidate, Policy Lead at Disability Justice Network of Ontario, and Community Lead on the Towards Just Care project.


This digital toolkit moves people from learning how to navigate and understand the complexities of Ontario’s current home care system to envisioning and building just care systems. We hope to build new pathways of home care that are publicly owned and directed, intergenerational, sustainable, and holistic.  


“We’re hoping these resources will help people in Ontario not just make informed choices about how to access and participate in Ontario’s home care systems, but also advocate for more socially just systems in the future” says Dr. Mary Jean Hande, Project Lead and professor at Trent University.


Just Care Dreams: A Toolkit for Building More Just Care Systems is available for download on the DJNO website at this link: https://www.djno.ca/justcare



- 30 - 

About the Authors:

 

Mary Jean Hande is an Assistant Professor in Sociology at Trent University and Project Lead for the SSHRC-funded Towards Just Care project.  Her broader community-engaged research program focuses on aging, disability, immigration, precarious work, continuing care systems, and struggles for social transformation.


Megan Linton is a PhD student in Sociology and Political Economy at Carleton University, and the policy lead at DJNO. Her broader work focuses on disability justice, carceral abolition, and the political economies of disability.

 

Disability Justice Network of Ontario is a provincial organization centered in Hamilton that aims to build a just and accessible Ontario, hold the powerful to account, and create a world where Disabled People are free to be.


Media Contacts:

Mary Jean Hande (Research Project Lead)

Assistant Professor, Trent University

647-458-5326


Megan Linton (Project Community Partner Lead) 

Policy Lead, Disability Justice Network of Ontario

289-780-3566


Brad Evoy (Project Partner)

Executive Director, Disability Justice Network of Ontario

289-780-3566

bottom of page